Contact

Send us your feedback

Thank you for your feedback. An email has been sent to the ESRC support team.

An error occured whilst sending your feedback. Please review the problems below.

Rediscovering the Civic and Achieving Better Outcomes in Public Policy

Grant reference: RES-177-25-0002

« View grant details

Other publication/report details

How does choice architecture influence organ donor registration? : a randomised controlled trial comparing opt-in, opt-out and mandated choice registration systems
28% of the UK population is signed up to the National Organ Donor Register - not enough to generate the required number of organs needed each year - at least a 50% more organ donors are needed. A recent organ donation taskforce advised against a move to an ‘opt’-out’ system where people are presumed to be donors unless they actively opt out - the UK, at present, continues to operate an ‘opt-in’ or ‘informed consent’ system. Those countries with opt-out systems have significantly higher rates of organ donation (25-30%) as compared to opt-in systems. Some states in the US operate ‘mandated choice’ systems whereby all citizens are asked if they wish to be donors and legally have to decide say ‘yes’ or ‘no’.
Full text
English

Primary contributor

Author Alice Moseley

Additional contributors

Author Gerry Stoker

Keywords

choice architecture; organ donor registration; RCT; decision making; human behaviour; opt-in; opt-out; mandated choice decisions; free will; organ donation; organ transplantation

Additional details

No
University of Southampton School of Social Sciences
01 January 2010
University of Southampton School of Social Sciences policy briefing

Files